Katana Cloud Inventory
- 定价
-
提供免费套餐
- 评分
- 4.5 (133)
配图图库
跨多个地点和渠道管理销售、产品和制造流程,有效防止缺货。
使用 Katana 获取实时库存见解。我们的云端库存管理平台可集中管理您的库存、制造、套件和捆绑包以及多地点发货,帮助您避免缺货并保持最佳库存水平。轻松管理所有销售渠道的订单,实时跟踪可用产品,并简化运营。整合销售、生产和会计,让您全面了解并掌控日常运营和业务表现。
- 多地点库存管理,避免缺货和库存积压
- 根据精确的物料需求和补货点生成采购订单
- 集中管理跨多个地点和销售渠道的发货
- 管理制造、生产计划、资源分配和排程
- 将关键财务数据发送至 QuickBooks Online 和 Xero 等会计软件
包含自动翻译的文本
语言
英语
这款应用未翻译成简体中文
适配以下产品:
- ...And more
- API
- QuickBooks
- Salesforce
- Xero
- Zapier
评论 (133)
Our Experience with Katana MRP – Why We Left After 6 Years
We were early adopters of Katana MRP, using it as our primary manufacturing resource planning system for over six years. In the beginning, Katana delivered exactly what we needed - solid functionality, reasonable pricing, and an easy-to-use interface that worked well for a small manufacturer like us with modest sales order volume. Initially, the pricing was fair and manageable. But once Katana began taking on outside investment and aggressively scaling, things started to change.
Over time, they revamped their pricing model multiple times. At first it was tied to relatively simple metrics like number of users, but later it shifted to limits based on sales order line items, then to sales orders and gross merchandise value (GMV). What sounded sophisticated in their marketing quickly became a huge headache for us: as a small shop selling mostly items around $10 each, our high order count, not our actual revenue, automatically bumped us into higher pricing tiers. So we ended up paying almost the same as companies doing $50 million+ in annual sales, despite using a fraction of the features and resources.
We’ve also experienced price changes mid-subscription period without meaningful notice, and being forced into annual negotiations simply to keep our plan. Year after year, it became clear that the company didn’t care about smaller customers anymore: their strategy seems squarely aimed at upmarket customers with big order volume and deep pockets - which pits small manufacturers like us at a disadvantage.
Frankly, the model feels punitive, not proportional. If your business sells a lot of small-ticket orders, you get punished with pricing far beyond the value you actually consume - and that’s simply not sustainable for a real small manufacturer.
In the end, after dealing with repeated increasing costs and painfully going around in circles with account reps who didn't take the time to understand our business, we pulled the plug and took the time and effort to migrate to a different MRP that met all our requirements. It is faster, easier to use, and roughly ¼ of the cost of Katana’s current pricing. That switch has been night and day for our team - not only financially but also operationally. On the plus side, Katana made it easy for us to export our data and we performed the data migration and cut-over to the new system entirely in-house.
Bottom line: Katana may still work for some companies, especially larger, growing SMBs with high-priced items and few orders, but for small manufacturers with many sales orders and modest item prices, their current pricing strategy simply doesn’t make sense anymore.
very powerful app, that covered all of our needs and more. We had a great onboard experience. You'll be assigned an onboard specialist who is widely available to support you and answer questions. Taylor Hagel was our onboard specialist and he knew the software inside and out and communicated very well.
The integration is very simple and easy to set up! I wish we could carry tags from Shopify to Katana as well as delay the synch, so it is not automatic. However, we were able to find work around and the app works great overall.
支持
应用支持由 Katana Cloud Inventory 提供。
开发人员
推出日期
2019年3月20日 · 更改日志
更多此类应用